Observing Karwa Chauth for Another Man Constitutes Mental Cruelty, Rules Jaipur Court
A family court in Jaipur has dissolved a 13-year marriage, ruling that a wife observing a Karwa Chauth fast for another man amounts to mental cruelty.

Landmark Legal Ruling in Jaipur
A family court in Jaipur has delivered a significant ruling in matrimonial jurisprudence, declaring that a wife observing a traditional Karwa Chauth fast for a man other than her husband constitutes mental cruelty. Family Court-2 Judge Vishal Bhargava dissolved a 13-year-old marriage after concluding that the woman's actions and her relationship with a third party led to an irretrievable breakdown of trust within the marital bond.
Legal proceedings commenced on January 27, 2023, nearly a decade after the couple's wedding. The husband filed for divorce citing severe mental harassment, an absolute refusal by the spouse to continue the matrimonial relationship, and an absence of physical intimacy since 2019. Evidence presented during the hearings established that the couple had been living separately for over a year.
Beyond Ordinary Friendship
During the trial, the husband detailed how his wife's relationship with the other individual transcended the boundaries of ordinary friendship. According to the court documents, the petitioner claimed that on October 24, 2021, his wife traveled to Goa and publicly celebrated Karwa Chauth with the other man, treating him as her husband. The petitioner asserted that she had effectively adopted this individual as her life partner, frequently spending extended periods with him.
Further compounding the grievances, the husband alleged that his spouse exhibited abusive behavior toward his elderly parents and failed in her responsibilities toward their minor son. He also claimed that the filing of contentious legal complaints against him by his wife added to his severe psychological distress.
Court Observations and Final Verdict
After a thorough evaluation of both oral testimonies and documentary evidence, the court determined that the cumulative actions of the wife subjected the husband to profound mental cruelty. Judge Bhargava emphasized that maintaining peace of mind and mutual trust—the fundamental pillars of any viable marriage—had become impossible under the circumstances.
Consequently, the court granted the husband's petition, officially dissolving the marriage and setting a notable precedent regarding the legal interpretation of marital infidelity and psychological harassment in Indian family courts.
About Gaurav Sen
Senior Editorial Director & Lead Geopolitical Analyst
Senior Editorial Director and investigative correspondent covering national affairs, international relations, defense, and economic policy for Daily News 365.


